The Trump administration’s “NATO 3.0” concept calls for European allies to assume primary responsibility for their own conventional defense while the United States redirects resources to other priorities and pursues diplomacy with Russia. Unfortunately, the administration’s pursuit of other goals is undercutting this vision. Washington has sought territorial concessions from allies, imposed tariffs, weighed in on allies’ domestic politics, and engaged in operations against Iran that depend on a robust US military presence in Europe. Collectively, these policies have eroded the perception of shared interests needed for continued partnership, added friction to European rearmament, and delayed US posture changes. To promote NATO 3.0, Washington should abandon these competing objectives, continue to reduce the US military’s role in the region, and adjust force structure to redirect resources to higher priorities.
Trending
- China’s Next Frontier | Foreign Affairs
- Elbit Systems to Produce Laser Warning Systems in Sweden
- Leonardo DRS awarded JIATF-401 IDIQ contract to accelerate delivery of tactical expeditionary sensing capabilities for critical counter UAS mission
- Uvision Advances Sensor-to-Effect Operations at Scale
- Ukraine Can Turn Imminent Peril to Its Advantage
- US Army transfers 600 enlisted soldiers to Space Operations Branch
- Army looking to advance another new rifle for troops | Headlines
- Skapion unveils the world’s first native counter-swarm defense system

