The Trump administration’s “NATO 3.0” concept calls for European allies to assume primary responsibility for their own conventional defense while the United States redirects resources to other priorities and pursues diplomacy with Russia. Unfortunately, the administration’s pursuit of other goals is undercutting this vision. Washington has sought territorial concessions from allies, imposed tariffs, weighed in on allies’ domestic politics, and engaged in operations against Iran that depend on a robust US military presence in Europe. Collectively, these policies have eroded the perception of shared interests needed for continued partnership, added friction to European rearmament, and delayed US posture changes. To promote NATO 3.0, Washington should abandon these competing objectives, continue to reduce the US military’s role in the region, and adjust force structure to redirect resources to higher priorities.
Trending
- Space Force faces budget uncertainty as leader plans exit next month
- More than 50 Dem lawmakers demand more Schedule F transparency
- CDC nominee says she won’t betray science — while declining to challenge Kennedy’s actions
- Fedorov out as Ukraine’s defense minister in major government shake-up
- How to Deliver on NATO 3.0
- From Unterlüß to the Ukraine: Rheinmetall delivers artillery ammunition from the “Werk Niedersachsen” for the first time
- Army Announces Project Convergence-Capstone 6: A Milestone in Modernization
- USS Sampson spills roughly 2,000 gallons of diesel fuel into Seattle harbor

